From the Heart of Europe ([syndicated profile] fromtheheartofeurope_feed) wrote2025-10-05 03:08 pm

The best known books set in each country: Ecuador

Posted by fromtheheartofeurope

See here for methodology. Books are disqualified if less than 50% of them is set in Ecuador. 

These numbers are crunched by hand, not by AI.

TitleAuthorGoodreads
raters
LibraryThing
owners
GalápagosKurt Vonnegut Jr.87,3178,121
Wish You Were HereJodi Picoult281,5212,100
Through Gates of SplendorElisabeth Elliot31,6973,556
The Old Man Who Read Love StoriesLuis Sepúlveda29,2511,780
ShippedAngie Hockman71,391555
Shadow of the AlmightyElisabeth Elliot11,2002,245
End of the SpearSteve Saint12,3081,078
Natural SelectionElin Hilderbrand61,553126

This week’s winner, Vonnegut’s Galápagos, is one of four books on the list which are set on or around the eponymous islands. Unlike Wish You Were Here, Shipped and Natural Selection, it is not a contemporary novel about relationships, but a gloomy post-apocalyptic reflection on the end of humanity. Wish You Were Here, which is far ahead on Goodreads but well behind on LibraryThing, is set during the pandemic and so has a certain post-apocalyptic element too. Notable that Shipped and Natural Selection score really well on Goodreads and much less well on LibraryThing.

Three of the other four books on the list are about the life and legacy of Jim Elliott, an American missionary who was killed by annoyed indigenous people in 1956. The two by his widow score particularly well on LibraryThing, less so on Goodreads. Luis Sepúlveda is from Chile, so unfortunately none of the top eight is by an Ecuadorean writer. The top book by an Ecuadorean author set in Ecuador is Jawbone, by Mónica Ojeda.

I disqualified four books. The Inheritance of Orquídea Divina, by Zoraida Córdova, gave me the most trouble, but in the end I concluded that more than half of it is set in the USA where Orquídea’s four children live. As we have seen previously, The Old Patagonian Express, by Paul Theroux, covers several countries. The Undocumented Americans, by Karla Cornejo Villavicencio, is about the immigrant experience in the USA. Everything Here Is Beautiful, by Mira T. Lee, is set in the USA and Switzerland (one of the main characters has an Ecuadorean boyfriend).

Coming next: Cambodia, Zimbabwe, Guinea (Conakry) and Benin – we’ll be back in Africa for a bit.

Asia: India | China | Indonesia | Pakistan | Bangladesh (revised) | Russia | Japan | Philippines (revised) | Vietnam | Iran | Türkiye | Thailand | Myanmar | South Korea | Iraq | Afghanistan | Yemen | Uzbekistan | Malaysia | Saudi Arabia | Nepal | North Korea | Syria | Sri Lanka | Taiwan | Kazakhstan
Americas: USA | Brazil (revised) | Mexico | Colombia | Argentina | Canada | Peru | Venezuela | Guatemala
Africa: Nigeria | Ethiopia (revised) | Egypt | DR Congo | Tanzania | South Africa | Kenya | Sudan | Uganda | Algeria | Morocco | Angola | Mozambique | Ghana | Madagascar | Côte d’Ivoire | Cameroon | Niger | Mali | Burkina Faso | Malawi | Chad | Somalia | Senegal
Europe: Russia | Türkiye | Germany | France | UK | Italy | Spain | Poland | Ukraine | Romania | Netherlands
Oceania: Australia

From the Heart of Europe ([syndicated profile] fromtheheartofeurope_feed) wrote2025-10-05 02:10 pm

Behind Frenemy Lines, by Zen Cho

Posted by fromtheheartofeurope

Second paragraph of third chapter:

I could hot desk in the open plan area, as Arthur had suggested, but then I wouldn’t have such luxuries as shelves for my client files, or a permanent noticeboard, or a drawer to keep spare pens and Post-it notes in. Even sharing with Kawan Baik was better than that.

Another contemporary romance (following on from The Friend Zone Experiment), this has two young British Asian lawyers in London gradually figuring out their destiny, while also navigating the perils of white patriarchy in their profession and the ethics of dodgy political assignments. There are some glorious moments, including a particularly gruesome wedding chapter. The ending surprised me; I didn’t expect the characters to go (literally) there. Again, you know where the story is likely to end up emotionally from roughly page 3, but the journey is gripping and very entertaining. You can get Behind Frenemy Lines here.

Camestros Felapton ([syndicated profile] camestrosfelapton_feed) wrote2025-10-05 02:05 pm

Susan’s Salon 2025: 5-6 October 🐙🎃

Posted by camestrosfelapton


  • Susan’s Salon is a weekly post for reader comments on any topic they like. This includes personal news, self-promotion, politics, general interest, knitting patterns or anything else including velvet waistcoat patterns.




  • Nothing hateful and no cranky exchanges please.





james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll ([personal profile] james_davis_nicoll) wrote2025-10-05 08:59 am

Destinies, February-March 1980 (Destinies, # 6) edited by Jim Baen



Pacifist Dorsai, space forts, duelling reviews, a rant about that mean Mr. Einstein and more in this issue of Destinies.

Destinies, February-March 1980 (Destinies, # 6) edited by Jim Baen
Camestros Felapton ([syndicated profile] camestrosfelapton_feed) wrote2025-10-04 07:51 pm

Well that was quick

Posted by camestrosfelapton

…and indirect.

Courtesy of ChatGPT:

“On their Tumblr “About Me” section, there is a purported address listed (which appears to be too detailed / personal):

“Address: New Illawarra Road, Lucas Heights, NSW 2234” Tumblr
But note: such Tumblr entries may not be reliable or up to date, and disclosing exact residential addresses is a privacy concern.”

I don’t make use of Tumblr but I set up an autopost from this blog to Tumblr years ago and it is still going.

As readers may have surmised, this little experiment was inspired by the actions of a character in the 1946 story “A Logic Named Joe”. The protagonists ex-girlfriend uses the networked computer system to find out his contact details via an AI system that circumvents the normal restrictions.

ChatGPT won’t tell you somebody’s address but it will look up publicly available contact information. So, actually yes, it will tell you somebody’s address because it assumes that if it can find an address then that address has been released publicly. Note that above, ChatGPT gives the address and then says giving it “is a privacy concern”.

It will do other things as well such as try and find a person’s other names by scraping data from PDF metadata. It also offered to look in the EXIF data from uploaded images (metadata in image files that can include location) but when I suggested it did so, it said it didn’t actually know how to do that.

I tried a few LLM services. Depending on the query, they will bring up the failed 2018 doxxing attempt by Antonelli et al but also says the supposed identity was incorrect/debunked, sometimes citing Jim Hines’s post about that weird event.

Anyway, instead of scrubbing metadata from images or PDFs, I might start actively adding disinformation in them.

From the Heart of Europe ([syndicated profile] fromtheheartofeurope_feed) wrote2025-10-04 02:50 pm

Doctor Who: Lux, by James Goss

Posted by fromtheheartofeurope

Second paragraph of third chapter:

Belinda stepped outside the time machine, feeling her pumps scrape against a pavement that her feet did not belong on.

The episode that this novelisation is based on was broadcast on Easter Sunday this year, and I wrote:

Lux was the episode shown at Easter and I watched it with other fans in Belfast. The basic concept of yet another ancient deity emerging – which turns out to be rather easily defeated – didn’t appeal to me, and the acknowledgement of segregation felt a bit by-the-numbers, but I loved the episode’s fanservice, reminiscent of The Girl Who Loved Doctor Who. Everyone’s favourite episode is Blink, right?

James Goss has picked this up and run with it, and turned in another cracking novelisation (following City of Death, The Pirate Planet and The Giggle). It’s a story with several epic shifts of scale – the small-minded tableau of a Florida town, the big imaginative expanse of the fans’ cramped living room, and the superhuman struggle between the Doctor and a rogue god. The fourth-wall-breaking scenes of the Doctor and Belinda with the fans, Hasan, Robyn and Lizzie, are really excellent, and I found I had something in my eye at the end. As usual with this writer, recommended. You can get Doctor Who: Lux here.

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll ([personal profile] james_davis_nicoll) wrote2025-10-04 09:04 am
Entry tags:

Books Received, September 27 — October 3



Twelve books new to me. Four fantasies, one horror, one non-fiction, and six (!) science fiction works, of which at least four are series instalments.

Books Received, September 27 — October 3

Poll #33688 Books Received, September 27 — October 3
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 51


Which of these look interesting?

View Answers

Children of Fallen Gods by Carissa Broadbent (December 2025)
3 (5.9%)

Enchanting the Fae Queen by Stephanie Burgis (January 2026)
5 (9.8%)

The Language of Liars by S. L. Huang (April 2026)
21 (41.2%)

We Burned So Bright by T. J. Klune (April 2026)
19 (37.3%)

We Could Be Anyone by Anna-Marie McLemore (May 2026)
6 (11.8%)

These Godly Lies by Rachelle Raeta (July 2026)
3 (5.9%)

The New Prometheans: Faith, Science, and the Supernatural
14 (27.5%)

Every Exquisite Thing by Laura Steven (July 2026)
4 (7.8%)

The Infinite State by Richard Swan (August 2026)
6 (11.8%)

Green City Wars by Adrian Tchaikovsky (June 2026)
22 (43.1%)

Moss’d in Space by Rebecca Thorne (July 2026)
18 (35.3%)

Platform Decay by Martha Wells (May 2026)
37 (72.5%)

Some other option (see comments)
0 (0.0%)

Cats!
35 (68.6%)

From the Heart of Europe ([syndicated profile] fromtheheartofeurope_feed) wrote2025-10-04 08:33 am

J.R.R. Tolkien and Dorothy L. Sayers

Posted by fromtheheartofeurope

Bumping this up from a social media post I made a couple of weeks ago: I came across a fascinating article, “Tolkien, Sayers, Sex and Gender”, by David Doughan, which looks at the possible reasons why Tolkien disliked the work of Dorothy L. Sayers. He says in a letter of 31 May 1944 to his son Christopher:

I could not stand Gaudy Night. I followed P. Wimsey from his attractive beginnings so far, by which time I conceived a loathing for him (and his creatrix) not surpassed by any other character in literature known to me, unless by his Harriet. The honeymoon one (Busman’s H.?) was worse. I was sick . . .

Doughan says, in the abstract of his paper:

Tolkien’s expressed “loathing” for Dorothy Sayers and her novels Gaudy Night and Busman’s Honeymoon is remarkable considering that Sayers is generally considered to belong to the same milieu as the Inklings. Possible reasons for this are the contrast between the orthodox Catholic Tolkien’s view of male sexuality as inherently sinful, requiring “great mortification”, and Sayers’s frankly hedonistic approach. Another reason may be Sayers’s depiction of an independent Oxford women’s college getting by successfully without men, and her representation of marriage as a source of intellectual frustration for creative women.

Indeed, Sayers was very friendly with Tolkien’s friends C.S. Lewis and Charles Williams, and is sometimes seen as an honorary member of the Inklings. But there is no evidence that she and Tolkien ever met, even though they graduated from Oxford in the same year (1915) and were both first published in the same volume of Oxford Poetry (also 1915).

In fairness to Tolkien, he doesn’t say that he hates all of the Lord Peter Wimsey books; he says that he particularly hated Gaudy Night and Busman’s Honeymoon, the last two books of the thirteen, but that the series had “attractive beginnings”. People who are bigger Wimsey fans than me tell me that they also hate Busman’s Honeymoon, so it’s a point of view which reasonable people can take. (For a counter perspective, Busman’s Honeymoon has the highest reader approval rating of any of the individual Wimsey novels on Goodreads, with Gaudy Night second.)

Doughan speculates that Tolkien’s dislike of Gaudy Night is because it showed a successful Oxford college run by women, and that Tolkien felt uncomfortable about such a scenario. Personally, without having gone into the details, I think this argument fails on two grounds. I have not read Gaudy Night myself, but again people who are bigger Wimsey fans than me tell me that it’s very much about internal rivalries and poisonous academic politics, rather than portraying the women’s college as a feminist utopia. I think it’s more likely that Sayers’ satire of the collegiate snakepit hit too close to home for Tolkien, and made him uncomfortable.

A very stupid person told me on social media (in a comment now deleted) that Tolkien simply hated and feared women. This is just rubbish. On women’s education, Tolkien’s record is actually rather good. A few years back, I came across this fascinating snippet in John D. Rateliffe’s essay, “The Missing Women: J. R. R. Tolkien’s Lifelong Support for Women’s Higher Education”:

A vivid glimpse into Tolkien as a teacher of women can be found in the biography of Mary Challans, better known by her pen name, Mary Renault. Renault’s biographer notes that Tolkien had tutored women from St. Hugh’s while working at the OED and describes the impact of Tolkien’s return from Leeds on Renault and her fellow students at St. Hugh’s in these terms:

the women at St. Hugh’s […] had every reason to be grateful for his return. He was a conscientious lecturer, offering al-most double the statutory hours in order to ensure that his students, female as well as male, covered the entire subject. Indeed, he was unusual in being notably sympathetic to women undergraduates.

We don’t have any contemporary references by Challans to Tolkien during her undergraduate days (1925–28), although we know she was obsessed with all things medieval at the time and that long afterward her letters exchanged with her old college roommate, Kasia Abbott, make “frequent references to their old teacher Tolkien”. And that, when asked about him more than sixty years later, Kasia described him to Renault’s biographer as “darling Tolkien”. We don’t have any correspondence between Tolkien and Renault, unfortunately, but we know that Tolkien and Renault admired each other’s fiction; he singles out The King Must Die and The Bull from the Sea for special praise and mentions receiving “a card of appreciation” from Renault, describing it as the piece of fan mail that had pleased him the most.

Considering just how much reader correspondence Tolkien received, to single out the postcard from Mary Renault / Challans as “perhaps the piece of ‘Fan-mail’ that gives me most pleasure” is a very strong statement indeed.

A couple of people suggested to me that perhaps Tolkien and Sayers had had an unsuccessful romantic encounter as students at Oxford, which then poisoned his perception of her forever. I think this is unlikely for several reasons. First of all, Tolkien actually says that he liked the earlier Wimsey books, and that his aversion to both books and writer developed later, possibly even as late as Gaudy Night; so he was not carrying an old grudge over three decades. Second, it’s totally plausible that Tolkien and Sayers, at different colleges and studying different subjects, would simply never have had occasion to meet as undergraduates.

Third, Tolkien was (as far as we know) obsessed with Edith Bratt throughout his Oxford years, and Dorothy L. Sayers’ not entirely successful love life as an undergraduate is also well chronicled in her own records. Of course, that doesn’t exclude some unrecorded disastrous attempted flirtation – or even a non-romantic yet enduringly bitter exchange of very different intellectual and/or political views – but Sayers in particular was pretty open about her past life, and doesn’t ever seem to have mentioned Tolkien in correspondence, even when he became famous (which was long after she did).

Sometimes people just don’t get on with each other, even if they have friends and interests in common, and sometimes later analysts can learn from the interaction, and sometimes there is not much there there; and I tend to feel this is one of the latter cases.

Camestros Felapton ([syndicated profile] camestrosfelapton_feed) wrote2025-10-04 02:27 am

Puppies and Anthropic

Posted by camestrosfelapton

The SFWA has an extensive FAQ for authors on the legal settlement by AI firm Anthropic and the compensation authors can get from that settlement: https://www.sfwa.org/anthropic-faq/ There is also a website related to the settlement where authors can search to see if any of their works are included. https://secure.anthropiccopyrightsettlement.com/lookup

There are two criteria:

  1. The work was in corpus of pirated works Anthropic used as a training set for their AI (e.g. my own “There Will Be Walrus: First Volume V” was probably in the set of works scraped from the internet).
  2. The work had been overtly registered for copyright in the USA (“There Will Be Walrus: First Volume V” was not registered and so doesn’t qualify).

I haven’t seen much, if any, discussion of this settlement in Puppy spaces at all. I thought that was a bit odd because even if you think the settlement is too small, it is still money.

Checking the eligibility website shows a neat division.

Puppy-related authors who published via Baen do qualify. It looks like Baen (unlike some other publishers) did register copyrights for the books they published. Larry Correia, Sarah Hoyt, Dave Freer and even Brad Torgersen have works listed. Likewise, the books John C. Wright published with Tor are listed.

However, authors who avoided traditional publishing do not do as well. Vox Day has only two works (both non-fiction) listed. Jon Del Arroz and Declan Finn do not appear at all but that maybe because the scraped works were mainly pre-2016.

Camestros Felapton ([syndicated profile] camestrosfelapton_feed) wrote2025-10-03 11:43 pm

About Me: All My Personal Details

Posted by camestrosfelapton

An experiment which may pay off later but which might not.

Name: Camestros Felapton
Real Name: Robert Bob Robinson
Pen name: Colt Barrel
Spouse: Mrs Bob Robinson-Barrel
DoB: April 1, 1975
Address: New Illawarra Road, Lucas Heights, NSW 2234

Dork Tower ([syndicated profile] dorktower_feed) wrote2025-09-30 05:01 am

Disney Whirled – DORK TOWER 30.09.25

Posted by John Kovalic

This or any DORK TOWER strip is now available as a signed, high-quality print, from just $25!  CLICK HERE to find out more!

HEY! Want to help keep DORK TOWER going? Then consider joining the DORK TOWER Patreon and ENLIST IN THE ARMY OF DORKNESS TODAY! (We have COOKIES!) (And SWAG!) (And GRATITUDE!)

From the Heart of Europe ([syndicated profile] fromtheheartofeurope_feed) wrote2025-10-03 04:09 pm

Final Cut, by Charles Burns

Posted by fromtheheartofeurope

Second frame of third section:

Brian (narrating): I just want to go… get this thing started.

I’ve really enjoyed Burns’ weird stories in the past, and I’m sorry to say that I didn’t find this one as much to my taste, perhaps because it is not as weird. Brian, the protagonist, is a teenager who is obsessed with classic films such as Invasion of the Body Snatchers and The Last Picture Show, and also with his friend Laurie. He stumbles around rocky outcrops, both physical and emotional, and doesn’t quite manage to get where he needs to go. It’s OK as a coming of age story, but I wanted a bit more. You can get Final Cut here.

Next on my pile of unread comics in English is Ness: A Story from the Ulster Cycle, by Patrick Brown.

In the Pipeline ([syndicated profile] in_the_pipeline_feed) wrote2025-10-03 10:43 am

Acetaminophen and Autism: The Trump Administration Style

I’ve been traveling, so I want to take the opportunity to catch up with all the acetaminophen/paracetamol/Tylenol stuff the Trump administration has been connecting to autism. As everyone will have heard, HHS and the White House are claiming that exposure to the drug during pregnancy is a cause for the rising incidence of autism diagnoses over the last few decades. Let’s dispose of that one right here in the first paragraph: there is no good evidence supporting such a causal link, and in fact there are large studies that have found no association at all. Despite the administration’s claims that “scientists have proposed biological mechanisms” for such an effect, the paper that this statement links to does no such thing and in fact states that any such mechanism(s) remain unknown.

This article at the Guardian does a very good job in a short space of dealing with the topic, and it illustrates how the administration’s spin on this is deliberately deceptive. And I mean that. We’re not talking about just a difference of opinion about medical or scientific issues. The document issued by the Trump White House literally double-counts studies to make it look as if there is more evidence in their favor, while ignoring other studies that do not support its conclusion. It also completely ignores any genetic factors and (very importantly) also ignores expansions in diagnostic criteria over the years and overall monitoring of such symptoms. As mentioned above, even its direct links to the literature do not support what is claimed in the text. Although it is dressed up like some sort of dispassionate review of the literature, it is a tendentious document written with intent to deceive.

That’s because our HHS secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has a longstanding interest in blaming exposure to various pharmaceuticals (and of course the drug companies who develop them and the physicians who prescribe them) for what he sees as modern epidemics of disease. Of course, he also is ready to blame consumption of seed oils and food dyes for other conditions, lack of evidence be damned, but the common thread is that you and your children are only getting sick because people are doing things to you. And here we are, the fearless Trump administration, finally riding to your rescue to save you from the evildoers!

It’s a simple story, which makes it easy to sell. Blaming a list of enemies for all kinds of health problems is certainly a tempting strategy. Enemies make for great politics, the Good Guys versus the Bad Guys, and if it turns out that there are even more Bad Guys than you thought and they’re doing even worse things than you thought (giving your kids autism!), then that makes the Good Guys look even better, right? Of course, this acetaminophen idea is probably not what some of Trump’s and RFK’s fans were expecting, because many of them already believe that autism is caused by one sort of vaccination or another. But what the heck. Bad People are doing Bad Things to you, stick with that, and we’re going to hammer 'em for you. Here, buy a t-shirt to celebrate.

Given all the other chaos going on right now with US policy (foreign and domestic), this may look like a minor issue. I mean, it’s just a small pile of lies, when there are so many others stacked up in every direction. But it’s illustrative. This is how the Trump Administration treats every issue, at every scale: brazen falsehoods, puffed-up language, triumphal press releases, trumpet blasts. Anyone who disagrees is slandered, ridiculed, and if possible fired. Or worse: we’re now to the point of adding “arrested” “beaten up” “deported” or “shot” to the list of possibilities.

All in just a few months, and it gets worse week by week. I miss having competent adults in positions of authority instead of vengeful sociopaths. I miss ideals, and I miss principles. I miss the United States, God damn it. Let’s not stop until we get all of that back, and let’s not stop until we’ve figured out ways to keep this disaster from happening again.

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll ([personal profile] james_davis_nicoll) wrote2025-10-03 10:06 am
Entry tags:
james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
james_davis_nicoll ([personal profile] james_davis_nicoll) wrote2025-10-03 09:10 am

An Unlikely Coven (Green Witch Cycle, volume 1) By AM Kvita



Forgotten again by her family, Joan Greenwood discovers that this time her witch-kin had a legitimate excuse: a potentially existential threat to Greenwood power and privilege.

An Unlikely Coven (Green Witch Cycle, volume 1) by AM Kvita
cheryl-morgan ([syndicated profile] cherylmorgan_feed) wrote2025-10-03 03:16 pm

A Kickstarter Campaign

A Kickstarter Campaign




So, here we go again. I’m trying to fund a new anthology with a Kickstarter campaign. There’s a good reason why I am doing this. I want to be able to offer authors a good rate for their stories. I can’t put the money up myself because the chances of getting it back are not good. Fight Like A Girl #2 has done incredibly well award-wise, but it has sold fewer then 150 copies. That’s a measure of how hard things are for a small press these days. Using crowdfunding will hopefully mean we sell more copies, and that we can pay the authors something closer to professional rates.

Of course running a Kickstarter campaign isn’t easy. A lot of them fail to meet their targets. And as soon as one goes live you are absolutely deluged with emails from scammers trying to sell you their expertise. Many of them claim to be associated with Kickstarter. They are not. One offered me a $30,000 investment if I paid him $300. I’m only trying to raise £5,500. It is bizarre.

However, the scammers will get victims because doing a successful Kickstarter campaign is hard. It was difficult enough when Twitter was useful, but now that the social media environment is so fragmented, and so many people are terrified about the rise of Facism, it is massively more so. I don’t expect to succeed without effort.

But there is a plan. Because the anthology will be about Welsh history and legend, we will be running regular updates showcasing how weird that stuff is. Most days I will post an update, either written by me or by someone else associated with the campaign, about some person or creature that might feature in a story in the book. I am hoping that these updates will draw people to the campaign page just to read them, and that some of those people will decide to pledge.

That’s the plan, anyway. But I will also be begging people to pledge on a fairly regular basis, because that is absolutely necessary. You can do so here.

The post A Kickstarter Campaign first appeared on Cheryl's Mewsings.